100 Mich. App. 440 - Fletcher v. Harafajee’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
April 1986
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he medical center is not a facility intended for exclusive treatment of city employees. It was merely an unfortunate coincidence that it was utilized by plaintiff.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Plaintiff’s present case is based upon the vendor-vendee relationship. The whole theory of the cause of action has nothing to do with the fact that plaintiff also happened to be employed by the defendant. We see no need for plaintiff to first seek relief from the Workmen’s Compensation Department when it is clear that the employee-employer relationship is unrelated to the cause of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.