Cunningham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2008
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 69 Cal. 2d 149 - People v. Wrigley · Daly v. State · Hotel Riviera, Inc. v. Torres · Brown v. State · Simpson v. EIGHTH JUD. DIST. CT., CTY. OF CLARK, DEPT. VI
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`It would be a very weak rule of law that would permit a man to ravish a fifteen year old girl and then say in effect: "You cannot convict me of this crime, as you did not guess the right date." See State v. Rogers, 48 Idaho 567 , 283 P. 44, 45 (1929).'" Cunningham v. State, 100 Nev. 396 , 683 P.2d 500 , cert. denied sub nom. Cunningham v. Nevada, 469 U.S. 935 , 105 S.Ct. 336 , 83 L.Ed.2d 272 (1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stewart v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.