Deere v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 1998
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boggs v. State · Crockett v. State · State v. Havas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an accused seeks dismissal for the state’s good-faith loss or destruction of material evidence, he or she must show prejudice flowing from the unavailability of the evidence. To establish prejudice, the accused must make “some showing that it could be reasonably anticipated that the evidence sought would be exculpatory.” Boggs v. State, 95 Nev. 911, 913 , 604 P.2d 107, 108 (1979).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Quillen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.