State v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably State v. Barber (2004), State v. Ortega (1991)
1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · State v. Bell · State v. Gunzelman · State v. Garcia · State v. Aubrey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant cannot sit back and insert error into a trial by his or her inaction and receive an automatic reversal when the crime has been fairly instructed on.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]f the jury instructions substantially follow the language of the statute or use equivalent language, then they are sufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barber“[a] distinction is made. . . between the status of jury instructions on essential elements and definitional jury instructions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.