State v. Dobbs’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably State v. Hernandez (1993), 1 N.M. Ct. App. 535 - State v. Tollardo (2012)
59 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Marron v. United States · ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) substantial evidence to support the conviction without reference to the improperly admitted evidence, (2) such a disproportionate volume of permissible evidence that, in comparison, the amount of improper evidence will appear so miniscule that it could not have contributed to the conviction, and (3) no substantial conflicting evidence to discredit the State's testimony.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sansom · Sanchez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.