State v. Chavez’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1993
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Oliver · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Harris v. United States · United States v. Wilson · Matter of Klecan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant contends that he cannot be held in contempt because under State v. Urioste, 95 N.M. 712 , 625 P.2d 1229 (Ct.App.1980), he could face federal prosecution on the drug charges. To the extent Urioste suggests that a witness who has been granted use immunity may be subject to federal prosecution on the same charges, it is not to be followed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Boeglin“[T]he constitutional privilege against self-incrimination protects a state witness against incrimination under federal as well as state law and a federal witness against incrimination under state as well as federal law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Boeglin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.