Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 N.M. 621 - State v. Manzanares

State v. Manzanares’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
4
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

2 district · 63 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Gallegos (2007), State v. Jacobs (1985)

2 district · 63 state decisions

30019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · Illinois v. Vitale · Diaz v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Reason and logic do not support a rule whereby one guilty of the crime of rape may escape a possible sentence of 99 years in the penitentiary by the expedient of pleading guilty to a charge of assault and battery in a justice court where the penalty may be as low as a fine of $5.00.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The fatal flaw in this argument is that the facts in [Waller ] would not support a claim of the jurisdictional exception and therefore the issue was not addressed by the United States Supreme Court. There was not a claim in ... Waller ... that the court hearing the lesser charge did not have jurisdiction to hear the greater charge as well.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “governed by the precedents of this Court[,] Alexander v. Delgado, 84 N.M. 717 , 507 P.2d 778 (1973) * * * even when a [subsequent] United States Supreme Court decision seems contra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.