State v. Case’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 57 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably State v. Gonzales (1992), State v. Hernandez (1993)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 57 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cuyler v. Sullivan · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. International Business Machines Corp. · United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co. · State v. Simonson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A review of the record indicates that Reich was crossing the street with a group of people when she overheard the remarks but that she had no idea who made the remarks.... [S]he would not say positively that any comment she overheard was made by a juror or overheard by members of the jury. She admitted that she could not say that any juror said anything.... Reich was equivocal as she could not say that any juror made or heard the remarks in question."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Case v. Mondragon“First, the statement must be made while the event or condition is being perceived by the declarant or immediately thereafter. ... Second, ... [t]he admissibility of the statement will depend upon the trial court’s view of the type of case, the availability of other evidence, the verifying details of the statement and the setting in which the statement was made. Third, the statement must be one which describes or explains the event or condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Salgado“[i]n the case of alleged juror misconduct, a decision of the trial court to voir dire a jury is a matter of discretion limited only by the essential demands of fairness. If there is no evidence of probable juror impropriety, the trial court does not abuse its discretion by refusing to voir dire the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gallegos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.