100 Ohio App. 106 - Weigel v. Grossnickle’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2008
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When found necessary, the Probate Court on its own motion or an application by any interested party shall appoint a guardian of the person, the estate, or both, of a minor.' * * * provided the person for whom the guardian is to be appointed is a resident of the county or has a legal settlement therein.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Fore“A *Page 13 guardianship proceeding is a proceeding in rem and the exercise of jurisdiction by a Probate Court binds all the world.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.