100 Ohio App. 3d 1 - Milo v. Curtis’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2021
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Celebrezze v. Gibbs · Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Fore River Railway Co · 117 Ohio St. 165 - Hoiles v. Watkins · Milwaukie and Minnesota Railroad Company and Fileming v. Soutter Survivor · 63 Ohio App. 3d 434 - Malloy v. Malloy Color Lab, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] receivership does not automatically end upon a change in circumstances or completion of the appointed task but, rather, continues until the court formally orders its termination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Whipps v. Ryan“a petitioning party must show by clear and convincing evidence that the appointment is necessary for the preservation of the petitioning party's rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.