100 Ohio App. 3d 606 - Hite v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2024
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Temple v. Wean United, Inc. · Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc. · Mussivand v. David · Noble v. Colwell · Jeffers v. Olexo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the action required by the statute is not directed at or designed to protect the public at large, but [is] intended to protect a specific child who is reported as abused or neglected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“bear the burden of showing that they fall within the class of individuals the statute was designed to protect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.