Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

100 Ohio St. 3d 246

State v. Townsend

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2003

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2003-11-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2005

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. Comer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-11-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed.

¶2{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court to apply State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
Lundberg Stratton, J.,

¶3dissenting.

Peter J. Wagner and Andy P. Hart, for appellant.

¶4{¶ 3} For the reasons expressed in Judge Grady’s dissent in State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473, ¶ 28-39, I respectfully dissent.

/100/ohiost3d/246 · .json · Public domain