Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

100 Ohio St. 3d 247

State v. Kittle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2003

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2003-11-12

Relies on State v. Comer

Decided 2003-11-12

¶1{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed on Proposition of Law No. 3 only.

¶2{¶ 2} The certification of conflict is accepted.

¶3{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
/100/ohiost3d/247 · .json · Public domain