Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

100 Or. App. 60

State v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 28, 1989

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1989-12-28

Decided 1989-12-28

PER CURIAM

¶1Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163,160, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in not specifying in the sentencing order the amount of restitution and court-appointed attorney fees that he is required to pay as a condition of suspending imposition of sentence.

¶2The evidence was sufficient to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, his conviction is affirmed.

¶3The state concedes that defendant is correct in stating that the court erred in not specifying the amount of restitution and attorney' fees that he is required to pay. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing.

¶4Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

/100/orapp/60 · .json · Public domain