In Re Hinton’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Pillatos (2007), Luurtsema v. Commissioner of Correction (2011)
64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Weaver v. Graham · Bousley v. United States · Collins v. Youngblood · Davis v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A law that imposes punishment for an act that was not punishable when committed or increases the quantum of punishment violates the ex post facto prohibition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`[A]n individual cannot, by way of a negotiated plea agreement, agree to a sentence in excess of that allowed by law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re West · State v. REANIER“for further lawful proceedings consistent with Andress and Hinton.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.