Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 SO2D 839 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott Smith (1962), 116 So. 2d 16 - Carraway v. Revell (1959)

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

1401958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bessie Cannon v. State of Florida · Koger v. Hollahan · O'Reilly v. Sattler · 75 So. 2d 312 - Miller v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... that defendant `had been drinking' or was to some degree under the influence is not proof of culpable negligence. Such evidence is admissible only upon the theory that persons under the influence of alcohol to any considerable degree, though not actually intoxicated, are more apt to be heedless, reckless and daring than when free from such influence; and, when standing alone, cannot make an act wanton and reckless that would not otherwise be so."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... it does not follow, however, that every fatality, regrettable as it may be, is accompanied by and results from conduct warranting a criminal conviction... . Before one can be so condemned it must be established beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt that the defendant has been guilty of negligence of the character heretofore defined.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “that criminal liability does not attach when the accused is by circumstances and conditions beyond his control and against his will, placed in the position and subjected to the conditions which resulted in the death with which he is charged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.