Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 SO3D 1058 - State v. Pressley

State v. Pressley’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 646 So. 2d 46 - Ex Parte Perkins · Cash v. Blue Mountain Industries of Carisbrook Co. · 601 So. 2d 76 - Spradlin v. Spradlin · 655 So. 2d 1060 - Scholl v. Parsons · State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Motley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[i]n the absence of an argument supported by legal authority, an alleged error of law committed by a trial court is' considered ‘essentially unchallenged on appeal.’ [Walden v. Hutchinson, 987 So.2d 1109, 1120 (Ala. 2007)]. An appellant waives .the right-to appellate review of a ruling on a question of law when the appellant fails to cite any legal authority on that point as required by. Rule 28(a)(10), Ala. R. App. P. Slack v. Stream, 988 So.2d 516, 533-34 (Ala. 2008). This court cannot cure that deficiency by creating legal arguments for the appellant, see Spradlin v. Spradlin, 601 So.2d 76, 78-79 (Ala. 1992), because it is not the function of this court to perform an appellant’s legal research. City of Birmingham v. Business Realty Inv. Co., 722 So.2d 747, 752 (Ala. 1998).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.