Dagerath v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Glaubius v. State · 718 So. 2d 155 - LO v. State · 822 So. 2d 1275 - Schuette v. State · 48 So. 3d 174 - Hunter v. State · S.M. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(l)(a) In addition to any punishment, the court shall order the defendant to make restitution to the victim for: 1. Damage or loss caused directly or indirectly by the defendant’s offense; and 2. Damage or loss related to the defendant’s criminal episode, [[Image here]] (7) Any dispute as to the proper amount or type of restitution shall be resolved by the court by the preponderance of the evidence. The burden of demonstrating the amount of the loss sustained by a victim as a result of the offense is on the state attorney.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parague v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.