¶1Affirmed. See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 (Fla.2001) (holding “the adjudication of a defendant as a habitual offender when the requisite ... felonies do not exist may be corrected pursuant to rule 3.800(a) so long as the error is apparent from the face of the record”); accord Rangel v. State, 937 So.2d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
100 So. 3d 169
Acosta v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 17, 2012
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-10-17
Relies on Bover v. State · Rangel v. State
Decided 2012-10-17