Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Enmund v. Florida · 519 So. 2d 622 - Staten v. State · 399 So. 2d 1362 - Enmund v. State · 791 So. 2d 44 - Bowen v. State · 76 So. 3d 1056 - Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To convict under a principals theory, the State is required to prove that the defendant had a conscious intent that the criminal act be done and ... the defendant did some act or said some word which was intended to and which did incite, cause, encourage, assist, or advise the other person or persons to actually commit or attempt to commit the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.