Laury v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 283rd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Clewis v. State · Johnson v. State · Jones v. State · Coffey v. State · Davis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We therefore believe Abron is distinguishable and Coffey is controlling. We hold that where the record affirmatively demonstrates that a fine assessed in deferred adjudication probation was not probated, there is no requirement to repeat the oral pronouncement previously given the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.