In Re Scott’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. · Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRB · Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps · MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A written provision in ... a contract evidencing a transaction involving [interstate] commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract ... or an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration any existing controversy arising out of such a contract ... shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract. 9 U.S.C.A. § 2 (West 1999).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“I agree to arbitrate any dispute, claim or controversy that may arise between me and my firm, or a customer, or any other person, that is required to be arbitrated under the rules, constitutions, or by-laws of the [NASD]. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Coordination of Claims Filed in Court and in Arbitration,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.