Hancock v. Shook’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
55 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hospital · Wilkerson v. Prelutsky · State v. Whitfield · Klonoski v. Mahlab · State v. Cole
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) the evidence has come to the knowledge of the party since the trial; 2) failure to discover the evidence sooner was not the result of a lack of due diligence; 3) the evidence is so material that a new trial would produce a different outcome ; and 4) it is not cumulative only or merely impeaching the credibility of a witness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An abuse of discretion occurs when a trial court's ruling is clearly against the logic of the circumstances then before the court and is so unreasonable and arbitrary that it shocks the sense of justice and indicates a lack of careful, deliberate consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Palmer v. Colle“The court's ruling on a motion in limine is interlocutory and subject to change during the course of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.