Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 SW3D 786 - Hancock v. Shook

Hancock v. Shook’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

55 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hospital · Wilkerson v. Prelutsky · State v. Whitfield · Klonoski v. Mahlab · State v. Cole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) the evidence has come to the knowledge of the party since the trial; 2) failure to discover the evidence sooner was not the result of a lack of due diligence; 3) the evidence is so material that a new trial would produce a different outcome ; and 4) it is not cumulative only or merely impeaching the credibility of a witness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An abuse of discretion occurs when a trial court's ruling is clearly against the logic of the circumstances then before the court and is so unreasonable and arbitrary that it shocks the sense of justice and indicates a lack of careful, deliberate consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The court's ruling on a motion in limine is interlocutory and subject to change during the course of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.