Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 SW3D 854 - Waserman v. State

Waserman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Allison v. United States · Distajo v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. · Luleff v. State · State v. Ervin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Abandonment “means conduct that is tantamount to ‘a total default in carrying out the obligations imposed upon appointed counsel’ under the rules.” Russell v. State, 39 S.W.3d 52, 54 (Mo.App.E.D.2001) (quoting State v. Bradley, 811 S.W.2d 379, 384 (Mo. banc 1991)). “ ‘Abandonment’ is limited to situations where appointed counsel completely and without explanation failed to file a motion on the defendant’s behalf, where counsel filed an amended motion untimely, or where counsel filed a motion so patently defective that it amounted to a ‘nullity.’ ” Russell at 54 (internal citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the rule’s purpose is to “aid in the constitutionally required determination that a defendant enter a plea of guilty intelligently and voluntarily.” “When the trial court enters a judgment on a guilty plea that is not supported by a factual basis, the judgment is not rendered invalid for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.