Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 TENN 303 - State v. Ross

State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
9
states following
June 1996
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 1996

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions

6018981900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Our statute clearly proceeds on the same theory, but the statute of Tennessee goes further than the statute of New York, in providing that such deposit shall be applied to costs as well as fine, and directs in express terms that the surplus, if any, shall be paid to the defendant:””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.