Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 Wash. 2d 520 - State v. Cameron

100 Wash. 2d 520 - State v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Lundgren v. Mitchell (2006), State v. Cronin (2000)

3 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

10019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Brown · 98 Wash. 2d 789 - State v. Crenshaw · People v. . Schmidt · People v. Schmidt · 93 Wash. 2d 95 - State v. Parr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no less insane because he nevertheless knows murder is prohibited by the laws of man.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “For a defendant to be found not guilty by reason of insanity you must find that, as a result of mental disease or defect, the defendant’s mind was affected to such an extent that the defendant was unable to perceive the nature and quality of the acts with which the defendant is charged or was unable to tell right from wrong with reference to the particular acts with which the defendant is charged.[ 5 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.