Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 Wash. 2d 607 - State v. Johnson

100 Wash. 2d 607 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

130
cited by 130 later decisions
5
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

128 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 130 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably State v. Gardner (2008), 105 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Bergeron (1985)

128 state decisions

4101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · 94 Wash. 2d 569 - State v. Savage · 274 Pa. Super. 44 - Commonwealth v. Thompson · 32 Wash. App. 916 - State v. Chelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless such entering or remaining shall be explained by evidence satisfactory to you”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Knowledge of criminal intent usually resides exclusively in the mind of the defendant. He may unlawfully enter a building with the intent to commit a certain crime, and ultimately commit a different crime, or no crime at all. He is nonetheless guilty of burglary. In either case, the State would be hard pressed to prove entry with intent to commit a crime if it were required to specify exactly which of several crimes available to the defendant he intended to commit. Such a requirement would seriously weaken the enforcement of burglary laws.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “clause, stating: Contrary to the majority's position, I believe the clause,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.