Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 Wash. 2d 788 - State v. Peterson

100 Wash. 2d 788 - State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2024

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

6019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 56 Wash. 2d 846 - State v. Baker · 96 Wash. 2d 816 - State v. Franco · 62 Wash. 2d 22 - Ashenbrenner v. Department of Labor & Industries · 85 Wash. 2d 133 - Thurston County v. Gorton · 86 Wash. 2d 567 - City of Seattle v. Rainwater

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At least once every three months a maintenance operator must check and calibrate a breathalyzer machine. In making that check the maintenance operator must follow all of the steps provided for in WAC 448-12-020. A record must be kept with the machine and the maintenance operator must record the date of test, control number of the ampoule used, and whether the machine is or is not in proper working order. If the machine tested is in proper working order, then all ampoules bearing the same specific control number as the ampoule used in the test are suitable for use in the machine.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) That the machine was properly checked and in proper working order at the time of conducting the test; (2) that the chemicals employed were of the correct kind and compounded in the proper proportions; (3) that the subject had nothing in his mouth at the time of the test and that he had taken no food or drink within fifteen minutes prior to taking the test; (4) that the test be given by a qualified operator and in the proper manner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Analysis of the person's blood or breath to be considered valid under the provisions of this section shall have been performed according to methods approved by the State Toxicologist and by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the State Toxicologist for this purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.