State v. Williamson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · 125 Wash. 2d 570 - State v. Gentry · 119 Wash. 2d 401 - State v. Strauss · 114 Wash. 2d 77 - State v. Rempel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After prospective jurors have been passed for cause, peremptory challenges shall be exercised alternately first by the prosecution then by each defendant until the peremptory challenges are exhausted or the jury accepted. Acceptance of the jury as presently constituted shall not waive any remaining peremptory challenges to jurors subsequently called.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williamson“The jurors having been examined as to their qualifications, first by the plaintiff and then by the defendant, and passed for cause, the peremptory challenges shall be conducted as follows, to wit:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williamson“defendant has no right to be tried by a particular juror or by a particular jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williamson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.