State v. Hahn’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Charles · 116 Wash. 2d 917 - State v. Davison · State v. Moen · State v. Wakefield · 94 Wash. 2d 354 - State v. Majors
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for purposes of restitution because it paid wages to victim while victim could not work); State v. Jeffries, 42 Wash. App. 142, 144-45 , 709 P.2d 819 (1985) (reimbursement to L & I for disability and medial expenses of assault victim); former RCW 9.94A.030(37) (1996). DSHS paid for the victims' expenses and then sought reimbursement of those payments through the prosecutor's victim assistance unit. See RCW 74.09.180; RCW 43.20B.060 (provisions authorizing DSHS to seek reimbursement). Further,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Hahn“The sentence as imposed is improper. Remand is necessary to permit the trial court to consider whether to impose an exceptional sentence or make the deadly weapon enhancements concurrent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Hahn“a deadly weapon as defined in RCW 9.94A.125, and invoking the provisions of RCW 9.94A.310 and adding additional time to the presumptive sentence as provided in RCW 9.94A.370.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Hahn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.