State v. Marking’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 121 Wash. 2d 333 - State v. Joy · 103 Wash. 2d 383 - Cox v. Helenius · 125 Wash. 2d 146 - State v. Krall · State v. Hickman · 121 Wash. 2d 513 - Erection Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“bear a consent warning. RCW 10.99.040(4)(d).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marking
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.