State v. Christensen’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 116 Wash. 2d 917 - State v. Davison · 8 Wash. 2d 93 - State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of Bremerton · 78 Wash. App. 870 - State v. Martinez · 119 Wash. 2d 385 - State v. Smith · 56 Wash. App. 209 - State v. Blair
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in civil cases was not necessary to justify its result. Because it is dicta, we need not apply it in the present case. We fail to see how a rule designed to regulate recovery of attorney fees in civil cases has any application in deciding an award of restitution in a criminal proceeding. The”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Christensen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.