Case v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis
1898
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Tumey v. State of Ohio (1927), In re Nevitt (1902)
3 federal appellate · 47 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oakley v. . Aspinwall · Pray v. . Hegeman · Moses v. Julian · Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co. · Mitchell v. Bain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No judge of an appellate court . . . shall decide or take part in the decision of any cause or matter which shall have been determined by him, while sitting as a judge of any other court, unless there shall not be a quorum without him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.