Stark v. Conde’s Empirical Analysis
1898
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1917
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Everitt v. . Everitt · Scott v. West · Jarboe v. Hey · Burnham v. Burnham · 8 E.H. Smith 532 - McGillis v. . McGillis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When a future time for the payment of the legacy is defined by the will, the legacy will be vested or contingent according as, upon construing the will, it appears whether the-testator meant to annex the time to the payment of the legacy, or to the gift of it.” 2 Williams, Ex’rs (7th Am. ed.)-515.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Benner v. Mauer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.