100 Wis. 2d 103 - State v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2007 · most notably 114 Wis. 2d 69 - J.F. Ahern Co. v. Wisconsin State Building Commission (1983), Graham v. Sauk Prairie Police Commission (1990)
2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 81 Wis. 2d 240 - Jacobson v. Avestruz · 14 Wis. 2d 186 - State v. Welkos · 79 Wis. 2d 22 - State Ex Rel. Korne v. Wolke · 57 Wis. 2d 159 - City of Milwaukee v. Leschke · Kerrigan v. Errett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The terms 'allowable costs' or 'taxable costs' have a special meaning in the context of litigation. The right to recover costs is not synonymous with the right to recover the expense of litigation. This right is statutory in nature, and to the extent that a statute does not authorize the recovery of specific costs, they are not recoverable. . . . Many expenses of litigation are not allowable or taxable costs even though they are costs of litigation.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Jury fees; discretion of court. The court shall have discretionary authority in any civil or criminal action or proceeding triable by jury to assess the entire cost of one day's juror fees for a jury, including all mileage costs, against either the plaintiff or defendant or to divide the cost and assess the cost against both plaintiff and defendant, or additional parties plaintiff or defendant, if a jury demand has been made in any case and if a jury demand is later withdrawn within 2 business days prior to the time set by the court for the commencement of the trial. The party assessed shall be required to make payment to the clerk of circuit court within a prescribed period and the payment thereof shall be enforced by contempt proceedings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to regulate conduct which is disruptive of the orderly business of the court”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.