¶1The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]), and we do not find that term to be excessive. We have no authority to revisit defendant’s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.
101 A.D.3d 482
People v. Randolph
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2012
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2012-12-13
Decided 2012-12-13