¶1The disposition was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection, and was a proper exercise of discretion (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The underlying *485incident was serious and violent, and the length and conditions of probation were not unduly punitive. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.
101 A.D.3d 484
In re Roxroy R.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2012
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2012-12-13
Decided 2012-12-13