Brasher v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1983
2 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States · Milam v. Milam · Miller v. Lutheran Conference and Camp Ass'n · 72 Ohio App. 93 - Akron Canal & Hydraulic Co. v. Fontaine · Kroeger v. Twin Buttes Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This [Article] does not mean that sometimes the riparian water rights doctrine has no force or effect in Arizona, nor does it mean that the courts will enforce the provisions of the constitution as is deemed expedient. It means that the doctrine shall not obtain nor shall it be of any force or effect in the state. Ever. Brasher v. Gibson, 101 Ariz. 326 , 330, 419 P.2d 505 , 509 (1966).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.