Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 Ariz. 382 - Cole v. Cole

Cole v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 1991

22 state decisions

1001966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schwartz v. Durham · Davis v. Davis · Crook v. Crook · Bailey v. Superior Court · Wood v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The equities of natural justice in a given situation may turn a court of conscience away from the cold realm of technical legalism, whereby the court will not allow the prima facie wording of its decree to defeat the justice and propriety of an exemption from the duty therein imposed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It would therefore be inequitable to force him to pay twice for the support of the child. If defendant had custody of the child for only a short period of time, such as a vacation, the rule would of course be different, because in that instance plaintiff would have an overhead expense and her total expenses would be only slightly reduced.” 101 Ariz. at 384 , 420 P.2d at 169 . (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t would certainly be inequitable to allow [the ex-wife] to collect money for support of a child during the time [the ex-husband] was actually supporting him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.