State v. Pruett’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 1975
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lisenba v. People of State of California · United States v. Ewell · Pollard v. United States · Smith v. United States · Beavers v. Haubert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An alleged denial of a speedy trial must be considered in light of the fact [sic] and circumstances of each case, Everett v. State, 88 Ariz. 293 , 356 P.2d 394 , and determined from a common sense viewpoint. * * * ” 101 Ariz., at 68 , 415 P.2d, at 891 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bowen“'when a person has been held to answer for an offense' and/or 'when a person has been indicted or informed against for an offense . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Favors v. Eyman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.