101 Ark. App. 405 - Grubbs v. Hindes’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2021
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Alphin v. Alphin · Tandy Corp. v. Bone · McGhee v. State · Razorback Cab of Fort Smith, Inc. v. Martin · Worthington v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto before or at the time the instruction is given, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection, and no party may assign as error the failure to instruct on any issue unless such party has submitted a proposed instruction on that issue. Opportunity shall be given to make objections to instructions out of the hearing of the jury. A mere general objection shall not be sufficient to obtain appellate review of the | «court’s action relating to instructions to the jury except as to an instruction directing a verdict or the court’s action in declining to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.