Eames v. Crosier’s Empirical Analysis
1894
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 1941 · most notably Bell v. Pleasant (1904), California-Calaveras Mining Co. v. Walls (1915)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co. · Jordan v. Grover · Ingersoll v. Herider · Curtis v. Sprague
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. It is a settled principle that if the party who transferred the instrument to the holder took the note for value, and before maturity, unaffected by any infirmity in it, the holder acquired as good a title, although he toolc the note luhen overdue.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.