Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 CAL 645 - People v. Abbott

People v. Abbott’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
November 1962
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 1962 · most notably 58 Cal. 2d 748 - People v. McFarland (1962), People v. MacDonald (1914)

28 state decisions

8018941900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Shem Ah Fook · People v. Etting · People v. Rodundo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ If the jury believe the property was stolen, and was seen in the possession of defendant shortly after being stolen, the failure of the defendant to account for such possession, or to show that such possession was honestly obtained, is a circumstance tending to show his guilt, and the accused is bound to explain the possession in order to remove the effect of the possession as a circumstance to be considered in connection with other suspicious facts, if the evidence discloses any such.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.