101 Cal. App. 694 - Orr v. Forde’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1964
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carnegie Steel Company v. Cambria Iron Company · Gray v. Bekins · Mineral Park Land Co. v. Howard · Carlson v. Sheehan · Snow Mountain Water & Power Co. v. Kraner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . To give the stipulation the effect contended for by respondent would be to deprive the appellant of an important defense interposed by him. . . . ‘The stipulation [made for the purpose of expediting the trial of an action] is to be interpreted with reference to its subject matter, in the light of the surrounding circumstances, including the state of the pleadings, the allegations therein and the attitude of the parties in respect of the issues. ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.