Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 CALAPP2D 500 - People v. King

People v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
November 1980
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 27 Cal. 2d 478 - People v. Adamson · 27 Cal. 2d 209 - People v. Tallman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The conversation between Hamilton and King' in the jail, as related by the officers who heard the conversation by use of earphones, was properly received in evidence. ‘ (A) witness may testify to part of a conversation if that is all that he heard and it appears to be in telligible.’ People v. Adamson, 27 Cal.2d 478, 485 , 165 P.2d 3, 7 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.