Walter v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2016
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City & County of Denver v. Bach · Richardson v. Halbekann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the duty of the county assessor to prepare the tax rolls and give the names and addresses of the owners of property thereon ..., and it would seem that the treasurer is entitled to rely on their being accurate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the treasurer was justified in assuming that the address used was a 'known address' and that he was not required to make further inquiry to ascertain where [the owner] could be reached by mail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.