Hudson v. Annear’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2004
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Barney v. Hawkins · People ex rel. Throop v. Langdon · State ex rel. Kendall v. Cole · Walker v. Bedford · 33 Cal. App. 104 - Chenoweth v. Chambers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““.. . their service is in subordination of the state treasurer, who, in the exercise of the general sovereignty inherent in the executive office which he holds,... shares his authority with none. In short, [the men] are em ployees of the state treasurer, and have not been... clothed with power incidental to a civil office.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“To determine what is constitutional is not committed exclusively to the judicial department. The views of officials of coordinate branches of the Government are entitled to consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bedford v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.