Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 Conn. 224 - State v. Reynolds

State v. Reynolds’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

2 district · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2003 · most notably Elkins v. United States (1960), Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado (1949)

2 district · 58 state decisions

350192419301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boyd v. United States · Weeks v. United States · Gouled v. United States · Amos v. United States · Albert Adams v. People of the State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the question recurs, Where is the accused’s remedy? The answer must be, by a civil action, the only form of remedy known for the protection of the individual against a trespass. It may be that the officer would be guilty of a contempt. If violations of these constitutional rights shall multiply, undoubtedly the General Assembly can provide for a penalty for subsequent violations. A penalty upon an officer for an illegal search made without reasonable ground would furnish adequate protection against such a public wrong. The creation of such a crime must be left to the legislative department of government. No such crime exists under our common law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen evidence tending to prove guilt is before a court the public interest requires that it be admitted. It ought not to be excluded upon the theory that individual rights under these constitutional guaranties are above the right of the community to protection from crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.