Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 Conn. App. 283 - State v. Ramirez

101 Conn. App. 283 - State v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · State v. Golding · State v. Troupe · Wheeler v. MO DIR. OF REVENUE · Strobel v. Strobel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “expert testimony should be admitted when: (1) the witness has special skill or knowledge directly applicable to a matter in issue, (2) that skill or knowledge is not common to the average person, and (3) the testimony would be helpful to the court or jury in considering the issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “presented a general description of the responses that are common among victims in these situations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.