Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

101 F. 1006

Docket No. 280.

The Iris

First Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1900.)

First Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1900-04-25

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.</p>

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1905

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on The Iris

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1900-04-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

¶2Frederic Dodge, for appellant.

¶3Eugene P. Carver, for appellees.

¶4Before COLT and PUTNAM, Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH, District Judge.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Whereas, after a hearing on the merits, a judgment was entered on this appeal on February 2, 1900 (40 C. C. A. 301, 100 Fed. 104), and afterwards, seasonably, a petition for rehearing was filed and allowed, whereby the judgment was vacated; and whereas, the matter of said petition has been fully heard on its merits, and the court is unanimously of the opinion that there is no cause for entering a judgment other than that heretofore' entered as aforesaid: Therefore it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed1 that judgment be entered in the same terms as those in which the judgment was entered as aforesaid on said 2d day of February.

/101/f1d/1006 · .json · Public domain